patrons are requested to favor the company by criticism and suggestion concerning its service
The filing time as shown in the date line on full-rate telegrams and day letters, and the time of receipt at destination as shown on all messages, is standard time.

Received at Main Office. www.GaleaSalutis.Net.


Vocationally Challenged Part Two=


=

The youth of today, and everyone, need to be vocationally challenged. We are all called to something higher, a call that is built-in. The reason there are no young people in church is due in large part to the pastors who approach our Faith as a new-age feel-good psycho-cure. Their substitute simply can not replace the truth of our Faith, and will always fall short in essence and effect. The truest experience of God’s love is not an emotional one caused by some flighty concern of the pastor for ‘personhood’ but is a supernatural experience, the revelation of Jesus Christ.

That is why parish ‘youth groups’ are meager collections of immature, giggly girls and effeminate boys, both of whom are pitiably superficial and as a habit avoid honesty with themselves. This is the unfortunate state our society and parish ‘ministers’ (always paid, of course) lead them to. The young people who take the next step toward searching for truth make their habit of insincerity into a lifestyle which they set to revolve around drugs, music, sex, etc. In their quest for truth, they seek and seek in all the wrong places because their true End, the Trinity, expressed in the sacraments, was hidden and obscured by the youth director who strove to drive through them that this Banquet of sacrifice, love, and obedience, was really an opportunity to foster pride, self-deceit, and individualistic ‘freedom.’

The solution is honesty, truth. The young do not want to hear only that Jesus loves them even when they snort crack; they want to hear that it is wrong, and why. Yes, there are reasons for discipline, reasons why things are wrong, and true reasons, not simply a “because we feel good when we’re clean.” That appeal returns to the individual (my feelings). The young are dying to appeal to anyone but themselves. They are just waiting to be challenged, to be called to something higher, to be called to their true dignity and vocation. In a very explicit sense, we must proclaim the message of salvation to them.


Vocationally Challenged=


=

Since the 1960’s (and even earlier), the young in this country have been characterized by rebellion at worst or reaction at best. What’s the deal? The desire to seek the truth is built in to us; by nature, we strive to grow close to God. Part of this desire is need to be challenged. We are restless to enter the quest for God, as Saint Augustine says. We are born with a inclination to struggle for something greater. Ultimately, that desire only finds its fulfillment in serving and loving God. We all know, though, that this desire many times gets derailed, in sublte ways just as much as in obvious ways. The rebellion of the youth is an instance of an obviously misguided search for God. Now, what was the older generations response to this rebellion? They began to dumb everything down, pandering to them, reaching out so far that they forsake their principles. The effect? Miserable and utter failure. That method does not work–its absurd, nor does it attract. In the prosperity of modernity, not many in our culture have to struggle for a living. Nonetheless, the ‘restlessness’ in us still impels us to apply ourselves at a struggle. Since no struggle readily presented itself to the youth, they created their own.

The reality is that the real struggle is only too present, the struggle for truth. These kids did not want to be told they’re special or important, but to encounter something real, truth. The same approach, presenting the truth, is all that our Blessed Savior did on earth. This may seem obvious, but it is a very popular idea today that Christ came to make us all feel good about ourselves or, if that is not the case, that should be the priest’s approach to ministry. I know it sounds completely ridiculous, but people eat this stuff up. It’s really sad. Priests do not need to worry about telling people they are loved or making sure their self-esteem needs are taken care of. We need to worry about the truth; it is the only message worth sharing. Knowledge of God’s love and the dignity of each person will flow out of this, because these things are true, but they are true because God decreed they should be, not because we express them to others or because we ‘feel it.’
To be continued…


Instant Success=


=

My good friend, Detective Tom Bombadil, has done it again. His mad blogging skills have won rapid renown for his latest masterpiece, Holy Ghost Conspiracies. The Curt Jester has already recognized the glory of the four-day-old detective story in his post. Bravo Bomb, I salute you.


Version 2.0=


=

Welcome to my renamed, redesgined, and reborn site. I have exchanged my secular ‘help me out’ with ‘Galea salutis.’ The ‘Helmet of salvation’ is an image of protection in war, articulating the very real battle that is waged over our souls. God equips us with the grace - the armour and implements necessary to overcome the devil. I also wanted to spotlight the current most neglected liturgical vestment, the amice. The neglect is therefore two-fold; the rejection of the small cloth vestment correspnds to a rejection of engaging in the spiritual battle, characteristic not simply of the clergy, but of the entire people of God. My title encourages a return to liturgical honesty and reengaging in the combat against Satan. I have transfered all of the posts from my old site to this one, so feel free to review your favorites (I always do before bed with Oreos and egg nog). I will be developing addition pages for more specific topics, pcitures, etc. I hope you enjoy the new site. Enjoy!


Obedience and Conscience=


=

Canticle of Mary
By myself, says the Lord, I can do nothing. I judge as I am told to judge, and my sentence is just.

As in all moments of his earthly life, our Savior instructs us through his example. In anticipation of the sacrifice at Calvary, his subjection even to death on a cross, He abandons his own will in order to conform to the Father’s will; he dies to his personal desires, hesitations, fears, etc. in order to live as his Father wills, in order to live for us. In these words from St. John which the Church asks her priests to reflect on this evening, Jesus gives us a very simple imperative: do as you are told. In the life of a priest, our Savior’s command demands many opportunities for heeding this call: serving where the bishop asks, the rubrics of the Sacraments, etc. In the life of any Christian, the same is true: the precepts of the Church, instructions from pastors and bishops, and the biblical and traditional prescriptions for the attainment of holiness. In our contemporary culture, we face a new challenge to this obedience our Lord demonstrates–moral relativism. Many voices suggest to us that an universal good and universal evil do not exist except in our imagination. They may advise a regard for morality, but only in an individualistic and disordered way. They may explain that we need to listen to our conscience, though deny the need to ground that same conscience in anything outside the ego. No 177 of the Catechism states

Moral conscience, present at the heart of the person, enjoins him at the appropriate moment to do good and to avoid evil. It also judges particular choices, approving those that are good and denouncing those that are evil. It bears witness to the authority of truth in reference to the Supreme Good to which the human person is drawn, and it welcomes the commandments. When he listens to his conscience, the prudent man can hear God speaking.

We understand that our conscience is a tool that God created in each man by which man can come to God. The conscience is at the heart, the very center of man; it is central to being human. However, the conscience is not an end in itself. The conscience is directed toward “the authority of truth.” Without this grounding in truth, each man would be seeking to live in his own world, his own ‘truth.’ This, in turn, alienates him from all other men and from the Trinity, who alone fulfills and frees him. The conscience is the tool, given by our Creator, to connect our action with his Will. Our conscience is not a set of rules in itself, but a tool to access those only real rules, those rules that are found in God. How then, do we use our conscience to obey our Father? Prayer? Definitely, but our Lord, in love for us and desire that we share in his happiness, established the biggest help, the Church! Christ understood that men by themselves are often lead astray, so He promised to remain us always, through the Church. It is the through the Church that the adminstration of the Sacraments is passed down and it is through the Church the truth about morality is passed down. The basic step toward the correct use of our conscience is to listen to the Church. The Catechism, No 1785

In the formation of conscience the Word of God is the light for our path; we must assimilate it in faith and prayer and put it into practice. We must also examine our conscience before the Lord’s Cross. We are assisted by the gifts of the Holy Spirit, aided by the witness or advice of others and guided by the authoritative teaching of the Church.

For the proper education of our conscience, we must look to the Church, who instructs us in the Sacred Scriptures, in the pronouncements of the Magisterium, and in the shepherds sent to the world–her priests. What more help could you ask for? If you ever doubt that Christ loved his flock, look at the Church and how it is structured. Christ continues to ‘go our of his way’ to reach all men and sustain them in his love. Ultimately, it is always the choice of the individual to accept the help offered through the Church or not. The message of the truth does not, however, stop at the priests. It is the most precious, most vital mission of the laity to live that message everyday and to reach out to those who do not accept Christ’s message. To respond to this vocation, we follow the example of our Lord by fostering obedience, forming our conscience, and conforming our will to the Father’s.


The Winner=


=

Justin was the winner with the comment:

Ecce homo! Here is your God - anyone wanna pie in the face?

I am finally able to get back on my blog. Our school got a new server and it has really destroyed any practical access to the internet.Anyway, thanks to those who commented.


Clown Mass Caption Contest=


=

I don’t think I have enough readers for this, so I’ll leave this open until St. Valentine’s Day. Enjoy!


Spending just one hour with Him=


=

The object of Eucharistic adoration is the divine Person of Our Lord Jesus Christ, present in the Blessed Sacrament. There is nothing greater or holier we can do on earth than this adoration.

-St Peter Julian Eymard, The Victim

If you think about it, any life which is to be lived in his presence must begin and be rooted in his full, real presence. In our times, Jesus is most easily recognised under the accidents of bread and wine. By seeing with the eyes of faith, we encounter our Blessed Savior, through prayer and adoration. Thus, we train ourselves, so to speak, in serving Him. If you train enough, we begin to serve him everywhere, particularity in our neighbor. The applications of service cannot and must not be separated. However, that service is based on a firm belief of Christ’s presence and a love for Him. Our Savior gave us the grace and means for this belief and love. He instituted the Holy sacrifice of the Mass, our divine encounter, where we form and strengthen our belief and love, whence we take it to share with the entire world. A sure sign of selfish vainglory is the tendency to oppose adoration and service of neighbor. To leave our Lord or avoid Him to ‘actually’ help fellow man, is an escape from the great Love of God and into the cave of our selfishness. Conversely, if we avoid or neglect others, justifying it with pious private acts, we sin just as gravely. In order to maintain a balance, Christ, and not our actions, must be our central focus. Central is our love of Christ, our relationship with him. When we loose sight of that, we will stray to on extreme or the other. One of hardest parts of Christian living is this constant ‘course correction.’ It is a battle, though, that our peace of soul demands.


Gregorian Chant: a Thing of the Future?=


=

I read this interview about Greogorian Chant through ZENIT available here: Gregorian Chant: a Thing of the Future? The President of the Pontifical Institute of Sacred Music, Monsignor Miserachs, articulated the need for Gregorian Chant. He expresses shame that

Gregorian chant has been abandoned and left to concert halls and CD’s when its proper place was and is the liturgy.

I understood his point about the onslaught of horrible hymns from Haas and Haugen, as the Monsignor stated

I think that new musical products, in the majority of cases, have not learned or have not been able to root themselves in the tradition of the Church, thus dragging in a general impoverishment.

Monsignor Miserachs explains that theses hymns from contemporary composers (if indeed they may be called so) are random, arbitrary, because they do not grow the rich (and I mean rich) tradition of our faith.

Latin and Gregorian chant form part of tradition — and they have been amputated. It is like cutting the roots …

He also articulated a sense of the fear of Latin in the liturgy. Many musicians, etc. avoid it like the plague and I have seen from personal experience that some even try to destroy or hide it.

Before, people knew how to sing the basic songs in Latin. Today, it seems that efforts are being made to make them unlearn what they knew.

I thought this statement was very true.

Q: Is sufficient attention given to the question of sacred music in the Church?

Monsignor Miserachs: No. For some time, we have insisted on this point. Our institute does its job, but it is only an academic institution, not a normative body and it thus has no say in these affairs. A Vatican body is needed that would directly oversee the matters of sacred music.

John Paul II stated that the musical aspect of liturgical celebrations cannot be left to improvisation or to the free will of the people.

It does not matter what people like; this is not a democracy. Gregorian Chant has an intrinsic value that is detrimentally absent from “Gather at the River” or “Eagle’s Wings.” Again, the Church, here, is interested in bringing you truth and Christ rather than pleasing you or making your toes tap and hips swing. I also noticed, looking at the text of these hippie hymns, that they are so egotistical and self-centered. Whereas in the past, hymns were written to raise our minds to God and sing about Him, these modern ones talk about the almighty ‘us’ and brothers and sisters, “lead us to one another.” Where’s Christ? He’s the middle man. He should be the center, the goal. Maybe I am totally bad at remembering things I read and heard over and over and over again, but I do not recall the passage “One another are the ways and the truths and the lives” nor do I remember Jesus calling the first apostles “Go, follow one another.” Oh wait, that’s because it is not the message of Christ nor the fundamental belief of every Christian. These crazy hymns not only sound like dying jungle animals (call PETA) but they’re not even Christian. Now, here is the balance. I am not denying that love of neighbor is tied into the Christian mystery, but I am saying that it is not the goal–nothing on this material earth is the goal nor should be the goal of our actions. When that happens, we call it idolatry, and idolatry is bad. We serve Christ everywhere, through prayer, in worship, and in fellow man. You cannot separate or pit the different means of serving Christ against each other. They all simply different expression of our love of God, but it is that love of God that ties them together and sanctifies them.


Now that it’s peaceful, I can take my nap=


=

Today in the Church, there is a wide spread trend to be a pacifist, to the point that, at least it seems in my diocese, it is an expectation for the presbyterate. It creates the demand and image of the priest as diplomat (between people). It becomes his mission to please everyone. Out of this mentality flow instances such as refusing to preach against abortion out of fear of upsetting the democrats in parish. In a real sense, the priest is a diplomat–between God and man, he is a diplomat from God to man. His mission should be to accurately communicate God’s message to man. The priest is not concerned with changing the message to please the hearers. If he does that, if he fails at communicating the message correctly, he is not a good diplomat, or messenger; he is not a good priest. The priest must bring God’s message to man, not bring his message nor bring God’s message according to someone else. There is a particular instance in my past when a fellow seminarian refused to vest before serving at Mass, an ordination Mass no less. He instead opted for a business suit with a horrible tie (just kidding, I do not even remember what the tie looked like). On inquiry, his response was, “Our diocese isn’t quite there yet.” I was speechless. We are not where? He was referring to the strong lay leadership movement in the diocese that has not yet completely died off. And by lay leadership movement, I mean the people who think that the priests have been keepin’ all the lay brothers down and oppressed them and that priests should just be ’sacramental minsters’ and lay people should run the show. So he decided, rather to simply do as the Church asked and, incidentally, as every single one of the rest of the seminarians was doing, to feed into that movement and try to please that crowd. I was crushed. I mean here is someone who has actually convinced himself that he can do something better than what God has asked him to do through the Church. He was trying to be a crowd-pleaser. On top of this, proponents of this ‘pacifism’ call this being ‘pastoral.’ Now, the different uses of the word may be accounted for, but when I use ‘pastoral’ I describe the caring, shepherding, pastoring of souls. Say what you may, but denying the Church (denying God) can never, ever be pastoral. It was out of love of souls that we decided to do as the Church asked and vest, because the Church has reasons for what she asks and those reasons are to help us reach Heaven. This other seminarian, rather the ministering to the soul, was trying to minister to the emotion or tastes of a person. That, however, is not the ministry Christ calls us to, in fact, I believe he warned specifically against being showy to attract the admiration of others. While in theory this crowd-pleasing may be called ‘pacifism’ in practice it is nothing more than indifference, laziness. Rather than risk (here it comes, the ultimate evil) –not being liked by someone–(oh! it’s so horrible), he neglects the soul–his job–and sits around in laziness. There is a reality that these guys should know. Every priest has people who like him and people who don’t, no matter what. No matter how nice they are, no matter how much they dumb-down the faith, no matter how much they avoided saying things that might make people not feel good about themselves, some people will just not like you. So grow up! Stop worrying about things you can’t change and start worrying about bringing Christ’s message–and only Christ’s message–to the people who need it so much. In other words, priests, please, don’t quit your day job!